LIVIA GIUGGIOLI ILLUSTRATES THE PERILS OF HARASSMENT LEGISLATION
Colin Firth's wife Livia Giuggiola, it seems, deliberately set out to deceive the public and conceal her affair with Marco Brancaccia. However, unforgivably, not content with appearing as 'the happy couple' with Colin, she alleged Marco was harassing her, when she ended the affair with him, in order to ensure he couldn't divulge what he knew. She claimed to police that she was 'frightened' and felt 'threatened' by his 'campaign of harassment'. She alleged that Marco was 'stalking' her and 'bombarding' her with messages. She said she 'lived in terror', fearful that he was 'following' her.
Marco Brancaccia has stated that her allegations are false and that his 'bombardment' involved two What's App messages and an email.
However, what is apparent, is that Livia Giuggiola's use of harassment legislation is entirely inappropriate, given the affair that she has only now revealed, and the inevitable untidy, emotional process of disentanglement that would naturally be involved.
Deceit, adultery and betrayal will inevitably stir intense feelings that, in a civilised society, should be expressed in words and through communications. Such democratic freedom of expression has absolutely no place in the court room. Those who embark on such high risk escapades cannot be surprised, when the liaison ends, that emotions run high, information is shared and facts are revealed. Courts should not be the places that conceal artifice and duplicity, nor that encourage immorality, by protecting the participants from the consequences of their choices.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5480429/Colin-Firths-wife-fling-friend-accuses-stalking.html
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0524008c-23e7-11e8-a25c-0a92182647c9
Marco Brancaccia has stated that her allegations are false and that his 'bombardment' involved two What's App messages and an email.
However, what is apparent, is that Livia Giuggiola's use of harassment legislation is entirely inappropriate, given the affair that she has only now revealed, and the inevitable untidy, emotional process of disentanglement that would naturally be involved.
Deceit, adultery and betrayal will inevitably stir intense feelings that, in a civilised society, should be expressed in words and through communications. Such democratic freedom of expression has absolutely no place in the court room. Those who embark on such high risk escapades cannot be surprised, when the liaison ends, that emotions run high, information is shared and facts are revealed. Courts should not be the places that conceal artifice and duplicity, nor that encourage immorality, by protecting the participants from the consequences of their choices.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5480429/Colin-Firths-wife-fling-friend-accuses-stalking.html
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0524008c-23e7-11e8-a25c-0a92182647c9
ARCHBISHOP JONATHAN BLAKE IS INNOCENT-HE HELPED STOP A PAEDOPHILE
"You brave, courageous and wonderful man. To stand up for the truth in the face of suppression and oppression is truly an act of a pure heart."
posted by Bishop Jonathan Blake | 4:01 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home