THE DEPUTY CHIEF CROWN PROSECUTOR FOR LONDON TAKES NO ACTION OVER WITNESS INTIMIDATION
On the desk of the Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor is a file that contains an admission from a prosecution witness, that he spoke to my main defence witness in a manner that the Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor states "may have been capable of being considered abusive" and that my main defence witness "may be a person likely to have been caused harassment, alarm or distress".
The judge had ordered that those with the prosecution and those with the defence should be seated in different areas of the court building, so that they would not encounter each other. However the prosecution witness left the area he had been ordered to sit in and came into the defence's area of seating.
My main witness was alone, waiting to be called. The prosecution witness admits he called my witness 'scum', a 'scum-bag' and 'a fucking x'. My main witness says he said much more and that my main witness had to flee from the area outside court, into the court for help.
My main witness found a police officer and petitioned his help. The police officer confirmed that the prosecution witness was in the area and was speaking harshly.
My main witness was alarmed, distressed and intimidated. My main witness was shaking and emotional, contacted a G.P., was referred for counselling and received help and support.
My main witness was not able to give the evidence my main witness had prepared in a witness statement.
My defence was seriously undermined by this.
However, the Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for London, Mr Malcolm McHaffie, has decided that the prosecution witness should face no further action.
I wonder why?
I submit it is because the police, the CPS, the barristers and the lawyers involved are all scrambling to keep the lid on a pot of worms. They know they have been involved in a major scandal. They know they have made some indefensible decisions. They know, that were it not for me, a paedophile would even now be sitting amongst children.
They know that taking action would draw attention to what they are trying to conceal. That the conviction of the prosecution witness, would fatally undermine my conviction and that in turn would destabilise the restraining order and the gagging order that are keeping the facts from the public.
They know that the papers are lining up to print the story of their gross incompetence, even corruption, even collusion with paedophilia.
The vulnerable children involved seem to mean nothing to the CPS. The children that were threatened by the paedophile appear to come way behind the careers of those involved, their salaries and their status.
One day, the truth will out. The public will be sickened by the roiling mass of worms revealed.
But at least, in God's court, we have been found innocent.
And, because of our actions, the paedophile is barred from having access to children.
The judge had ordered that those with the prosecution and those with the defence should be seated in different areas of the court building, so that they would not encounter each other. However the prosecution witness left the area he had been ordered to sit in and came into the defence's area of seating.
My main witness was alone, waiting to be called. The prosecution witness admits he called my witness 'scum', a 'scum-bag' and 'a fucking x'. My main witness says he said much more and that my main witness had to flee from the area outside court, into the court for help.
My main witness found a police officer and petitioned his help. The police officer confirmed that the prosecution witness was in the area and was speaking harshly.
My main witness was alarmed, distressed and intimidated. My main witness was shaking and emotional, contacted a G.P., was referred for counselling and received help and support.
My main witness was not able to give the evidence my main witness had prepared in a witness statement.
My defence was seriously undermined by this.
However, the Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for London, Mr Malcolm McHaffie, has decided that the prosecution witness should face no further action.
I wonder why?
I submit it is because the police, the CPS, the barristers and the lawyers involved are all scrambling to keep the lid on a pot of worms. They know they have been involved in a major scandal. They know they have made some indefensible decisions. They know, that were it not for me, a paedophile would even now be sitting amongst children.
They know that taking action would draw attention to what they are trying to conceal. That the conviction of the prosecution witness, would fatally undermine my conviction and that in turn would destabilise the restraining order and the gagging order that are keeping the facts from the public.
They know that the papers are lining up to print the story of their gross incompetence, even corruption, even collusion with paedophilia.
The vulnerable children involved seem to mean nothing to the CPS. The children that were threatened by the paedophile appear to come way behind the careers of those involved, their salaries and their status.
One day, the truth will out. The public will be sickened by the roiling mass of worms revealed.
But at least, in God's court, we have been found innocent.
And, because of our actions, the paedophile is barred from having access to children.
ARCHBISHOP JONATHAN BLAKE IS INNOCENT-HE HELPED STOP A PAEDOPHILE
http://bishopjonathanblake.blogspot.co.uk/2017/02/press-release-concerning-met-police.html
"You brave, courageous and wonderful man.
To stand up for the truth in the face of suppression and oppression
is truly an act of a pure heart."
posted by Bishop Jonathan Blake | 12:34 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home